Question from a reader:
I saw the news about Mr. Kokubun causing a problem, but why is he not referred to as “Kokubun Member”?
Why He Is Not Called “Kokubun Member”
Recently, I came across news stating that Mr. Kokubun caused some issues. Indeed, in the reports, he is only referred to as “Mr. Kokubun.” But why is he not
called “Kokubun Member”? Let’s consider the reasons behind this.
The Importance of Individual Names
Mr. Kokubun is not referred to as a “member” because his individual position and personal issues are being emphasized. Particularly when a problem arises, highlighting the individual’s name serves to clarify responsibility. This is something I felt while working part-time at a judicial scrivener’s office. Even the smallest mistakes can have a significant impact when associated with one’s name.
A Humorous Episode
The other day at my part-time job, I ate too many snacks, and my stomach growled during work. My colleagues laughed, but it was embarrassing to have my name associated with it. Similarly, in Mr. Kokubun’s case, when personal actions are exposed publicly, it underscores the need for individuals to act with a sense of responsibility.
Conclusion
I believe Mr. Kokubun is referred to as an individual rather than as a “member” because the emphasis is on accountability. We, too, need to constantly consider how our actions influence those around us. Now, if anyone has interesting stories or similar experiences, I would love for you to share them! Please comment below!
