Question from Readers:
I’m curious about the reliability of the rankings on “Suki Kirai .com.” For instance, a female announcer from Fuji TV has been ranked as the “most unpopular,” while another ranking states that “80% dislike her.” Are these votes really fair? Anyone can vote on this site, and there’s a possibility that one person could vote multiple times.
If that’s the case, it seems easy for a small group to create results that make someone look “unpopular” by continuously giving low ratings. Moreover, popular figures tend to have more detractors, so it feels premature to conclude that someone is “disliked” just based on numbers. Additionally, I think it’s unfair to discuss “why is this happening?” based on such rankings. To label someone as “disliked” solely based on a segment of online evaluations, without considering their statements or actions, feels somewhat misguided. In the end, how reliable are the rankings on “Suki Kirai .com”? Is it reasonable to evaluate someone based on such rankings?
Reflecting on the Reliability of Rankings
Recently, discussions about the rankings on “Suki Kirai .com” have been quite frequent. Particularly, the fact that a female announcer from Fuji TV has topped the “most unpopular” list, alongside surprising statistics like “80% dislike her,” raises questions about their credibility. When I see these rankings, I often feel like a group of individuals may be intentionally skewing the ratings. Since anyone can vote freely, malicious voting targeting specific individuals can occur. Honestly, I had never heard of “Suki Kirai .com” before, and taking the time to leave negative comments feels far less enjoyable than watching cat videos.
How Should We Perceive Online Evaluations?
Using such rankings as a basis for discussing “why is this happening?” makes me question their fairness. Ultimately, deciding that “this person is disliked” based solely on online evaluations, without considering their actions or statements, seems hasty. Especially since popular figures often attract more detractors. I have friends who take online information at face value and often claim, “This is why this person is disliked.” However, their reasoning is often quite flimsy. When I ask one of them, “Do you really believe that?” the response usually is, “Well, it was written on the internet.” This might exemplify a tendency to blindly trust speculative articles online. Moreover, those disseminating information should also consider their responsibilities. They need to adopt the perspective of the person they’re discussing; otherwise, their comments can become irresponsible. This can easily spread online, which requires careful consideration.
Lastly, I Want to Hear Your Thoughts!
That’s my perspective, but what do you think? I’d love to hear your experiences and opinions regarding rankings and online evaluations. It would be fascinating to share how we perceive information and the judgments we make. Please share your thoughts in the comments!
