Understanding Sexual Violence: Insights from the Nakai Masahiro Case and the Importance of Consent

Understanding Sexual Violence: Insights from the Nakai Masahiro Case and the Importance of Consent

Question from Readers:

Is there still a misunderstanding regarding the definition of sexual violence? Do you think Nakai Masahiro’s claims are relevant in today’s context? Recently, the report from a third-party committee has sparked discussion after Nakai Masahiro was recognized as having committed “sexual violence” against a former Fuji TV announcer. This recognition is based on the broad definition of
sexual violence set by WHO. According to this definition, what matters more than the presence of violence or coercion is whether the other party had given free consent. In other words, if someone was in a situation where they felt unable to refuse or could not voice their discomfort, it may not be considered consent and could potentially fall under sexual violence. However, Nakai’s new lawyer has protested that the term “sexual violence” carries a violent connotation and is therefore unjust. This seems to reflect an outdated mindset, suggesting that sexual violence only exists in the absence of assault or coercion. The revised Japanese Penal Code of 2023 states that “sexual acts in situations where the other party cannot refuse” are considered non-consensual and fall under sexual crimes. This is the current legal perspective. In the television industry, many voices express sentiments like “there’s an atmosphere where you can’t refuse if invited by a big star” or “even if you consult your boss, they may not stop it.” For young female announcers, it is realistically difficult to refuse a meal in a private apartment with a national star like Nakai. The report mentions that “Woman A felt a bit uncomfortable,” but can we really say that just because she didn’t refuse, it meant she consented? Nakai’s side claims it is unjust to label it as sexual violence when there was no refusal.

On the Definition of Sexual Violence and the Nakai Masahiro Case

Recently, the definition of sexual violence and the related issue concerning Nakai Masahiro have become hot topics. I would like to share my thoughts on this matter. Honestly, I was initially surprised and thought, “Wait, is this really being said now?” As a father of a daughter, I find myself particularly sensitive to this topic.

Considering the Definition of Sexual Violence

The broad definition of sexual violence proposed by WHO emphasizes whether the other party had given free consent, which is significant. Indeed, the notion that sexual violence cannot exist without “violence” or “coercion” may be outdated. I think it’s incorrect to view, for instance, the act of “forcibly undressing someone” as not being violent. Verbal abuse and psychological pressure should also be considered in this context. However, the concept of “consent” is indeed complicated. Particularly in contexts involving hierarchical relationships and social status, there is a palpable atmosphere that makes refusal challenging. I can understand why it would be difficult for a young female announcer to refuse an invitation from a major star. I recall times when I felt compelled to stay at a friend’s birthday party even when I wanted to leave, so I can relate to those feelings. I often think that I wish I had expressed my opinions more during those moments.

Thoughts on Nakai’s Claims

If Nakai thought, “If something like that happened to me, I would be happy,” I find that somewhat amusing yet frightening. Being a popular figure could certainly alter the reactions of those around him. Although I am of a similar age to him, I genuinely find it unsettling to view younger women in a sexual light, especially now that I am a father. Moreover, I think it’s a somewhat biased perspective to assume that just being alone at home together implies consent. While mutual consent is a prerequisite, the circumstances and ambiance can lead to situations where that is not the case.

Challenges from a Male Perspective

From a male perspective, it’s tough to deal with the notion that if you don’t make a move, you might be called a “coward,” and conversely, if you do make a move, it could be construed as sexual violence. In conversations with friends, we sometimes laugh about how challenging it is either way, but the reality is that it’s no laughing matter.

Share Your Opinions

What do you all think about this topic? I would love to hear your thoughts on the awareness of sexual violence and opinions regarding Nakai’s case in the comments. I am still learning a lot, and gaining insights from different perspectives could lead to new discoveries. I hope we can share our experiences and thoughts to foster a better understanding!