Questions from Readers
I’ve come across opinions regarding the causes of PTSD that caught my attention. There was a comment stating, “I understand why someone might have PTSD, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s Nakai-san’s fault.” Is this really a calm and rational opinion? The diagnosis of PTSD is something that a doctor determines through thorough questioning and assessment. Therefore,
when a third party suggests “it might be for another reason,” it seems baseless to me. Doesn’t that cast doubt on the individuals who are reporting their trauma? Furthermore, some people claim “there was no violence” or “there was no coercion from the company.” However, just because there was no physical violence doesn’t mean that sexual violence doesn’t exist. If there are psychological pressures or differences in power dynamics, I believe we cannot say that consent was truly given. Additionally, it’s dangerous to question whether someone really has PTSD just because they seem to be acting cheerful. People often put on smiles to protect their hearts, and doubting that can silence the voices of victims. Why are victims’ words always met with skepticism? If you were to receive a similar consultation, would you be able to say, “Is it really that person’s fault?” Do you think that’s the correct attitude to take? I believe that listening to victims’ voices calmly and indiscriminately attacking the perpetrator are two different things. However, if there is a basis for belief yet skepticism continues, doesn’t that become a form of victimization? What do you think? Do you believe such statements are indeed problematic?
PTSD and the Voices of Victims
Recently, I observed discussions about the causes of PTSD. In particular, certain celebrities were mentioned, and there were opinions questioning their influence. Honestly, seeing such opinions makes my heart uneasy, as I strongly feel that we should be cautious when doubting the words of victims.
The Importance of Listening to Victims’ Voices
It is natural for doctors to make thorough diagnoses, but when a third party questions, “Is it really that person’s fault?” it often lacks any solid basis. In particular, ignoring the words of victims who share their experiences can lead to secondary trauma. If I were to receive a similar consultation, I would prioritize carefully listening to that person’s story first. I believe it is essential to discern what is true within their narrative.
Overlooking Psychological Pressure
I frequently encounter the opinion that “everything is fine since there was no violence,” but that is not the case. Psychological pressure and power dynamics can have significant, albeit invisible, effects. For example, when I worked part-time at a judicial scrivener’s office, many clients found it difficult to talk about the invisible pressures they faced. Observing their expressions, one can sometimes sense the anguish hidden behind a mere smile.
The Pain Hidden Behind a Smile
Moreover, questioning whether someone really has PTSD simply because they are cheerful is extremely dangerous. A smile can be a defensive response to protect one’s heart. Personally, there are times when I try to forget my emotional pain while enjoying time with friends. Therefore, judging others as “seeming fine” based on their smiles is far too simplistic.
Aiming for a Society that Values Victims’ Voices
The skepticism towards victims’ voices stems from deep-rooted prejudices and misunderstandings within society. It feels incredibly unfair that those in power can amplify their voices while others struggle to be heard. Each of us should cultivate a mindset that values and seeks to understand the words of victims. Finally, I would love to hear your opinions and experiences. What do you think? How do you perceive the voices of victims? Please share your thoughts in the comments. I hope our discussions can help deepen understanding of this issue, even if just a little.
