Thoughts on Tohru Hashimoto’s Statements
Recently, I was honestly surprised to see Tohru Hashimoto making statements in defense of Masahiro Nakai. When I heard him say things like, “It’s dangerous for a man to be labeled a criminal based solely on a woman’s claims,” and “A crime of non-consensual intercourse does not simply arise from a lack of consent,” I
understood that he has his own perspective. However, I still have some doubts.
The Difference Between Fact-Finding and Criminal Trials
It is indeed true that the third-party committee only recognized the facts and did not impose any criminal penalties. Hashimoto’s insistence that Nakai was “condemned” seems to miss the point. Speaking as if he were found guilty in a criminal trial can be quite misleading. As someone who works in a judicial office, I realize the importance of understanding legal perspectives.
The Role of the Third-Party Committee
Furthermore, Hashimoto argues that it is wrong for the third-party committee to evaluate Nakai’s actions. However, I believe it is crucial to assess the nature of those actions in corporate investigations. To investigate the background and responses to corporate scandals, evaluating the actions in question is unavoidable. Denying this undermines the very purpose of the third-party committee.
The Issue of Evidence Disclosure
Hashimoto also mentions the issue of evidence disclosure, and it is clear that the third-party committee has discretionary power regarding this. His anger at the lack of disclosure seems to indicate either a misunderstanding of the system or an attempt to provoke confusion. Personally, I feel that understanding the legal framework is essential to avoid trouble.
Considerations on the Definition of Sexual Violence
Finally, when Hashimoto asserts, “This matter does not constitute sexual violence,” his reasoning appears vague and lacks persuasiveness. What he may really want to convey is that the media and the public are unfairly attacking Nakai. However, it raises the question of whether portraying the third-party committee as the villain is justified. As I work in the legal field, I often encounter various opinions and perspectives. There are times when I arrive at the office too early and find myself alone, or moments when I indulge a bit too much in snacks during work breaks. In the midst of such daily life, I would love to hear your thoughts and experiences. Please feel free to share in the comments section. All opinions are welcome!
