Question from a reader:
If a person born as the child of a billionaire is only helping out at home without working, does this violate the constitution? I know a painter who earns 500 million yen a year, and his children do not marry or work, only helping out at home. Can such a situation be considered unconstitutional? It seems to
me that it appears they are being lazy because their parents are wealthy, and I wonder if they are violating a constitution that applies to all citizens.

Children of Billionaires and the Constitution: The Ethics of Helping at Home Without Working

Introduction

Hello! Today, I would like to discuss a rather intriguing topic. The question is, “Is it unconstitutional for the children of billionaires to only help out at home without working?” This issue has several facets, and it is difficult to simply say “yes” or “no.” Through my own experiences in the entertainment industry, I often reflect on the structure and rules of society, so I would like to delve a little deeper into this topic.

The Constitution and the Right to Work

First, let’s touch on the right to work as stated in the constitution. Article 27 of the Japanese Constitution states, “All people have the right to work and have the obligation to do so.” There is much debate about the interpretation of this clause, but essentially, it is understood that “everyone has the right to achieve self-realization through work.” However, a question arises here. Children born into wealthy families actually have the option of “not having to work.” How should we think about this in relation to the constitutionally guaranteed “right to work”? If they decide “not to work,” are they infringing on the constitution, or are they exercising their rights?

Social Responsibility and Individual Freedom

Next, I want to consider the aspect of social responsibility. If the children of billionaires are not contributing to society beyond just helping at home, is that acceptable? I have heard stories of acquaintances who are successful in business, and their children spend their time playing without doing anything. Of course, I understand the desire to enjoy life using their parents’ wealth, but I also think that as members of society, they are expected to “give something back.” This is what we refer to as a “moral obligation.”

The Possibility of Constitutional Violation

Now, considering these perspectives, how is the constitutional issue positioned if the children of billionaires are only helping at home without contributing to society? In reality, the constitution does not explicitly state that one “must work,” so it can be considered that they are not directly violating it. However, the intention of social systems and rules is that “everyone should have equal opportunities,” and whether being born into a wealthy family grants that person privileges is a separate discussion.

The Significance and Value of Work

Additionally, there is a mental aspect to working. Feeling personal growth through work, having connections with others, and contributing to society are important elements of life. I am also curious about how wealthy children, who have the option not to work, understand the “significance of work.” Through my own experiences in the entertainment industry, I have come to know the joy and sense of achievement that comes from working. Therefore, I also wonder if a life spent merely staying at home truly leads to happiness.

Conclusion: Perspectives from the Constitution and Society

In conclusion, it cannot be said that the children of billionaires are violating the constitution by only helping out at home without working. However, how they contribute to society and whether that choice truly leads to happiness is another matter. We need to reflect on our own ways of living and values and consider what we can do to build a prosperous society. While we cannot simply label the children of billionaires as “lazy,” how they utilize their privileges will be an important factor in the future of society. Finally, it is essential for all of us to find ways to contribute to society from our respective positions and to seek paths for self-realization. I believe that precisely because they are the children of billionaires, they have the opportunity to look towards society and create new value.