Question from a reader:
I have some questions regarding a statement made by a well-known screenwriter who said, “Don’t use illness as a tool for emotion.” It seems contradictory to me that he has worked on many pieces that revolve around disabilities and illnesses in the past, yet now he makes such a statement. I believe it is essential for former announcers to share their experiences as it raises important social issues. Criticizing her for using her voice as a “tool for emotion” feels like it ignores her intentions. When
making such statements, shouldn’t one consider the consistency with their past actions and works? Especially for influential figures, it’s crucial to carefully think about how their words will be received. What do you all think about this issue? How do you view freedom of expression?
Illness as a Tool for Emotion and Its Impact
Recently, a prominent screenwriter’s remark, “Don’t use illness as a tool for emotion,” has sparked discussions. Many people undoubtedly have questions about this statement. Why would he say such a thing now when he has previously worked on themes involving disabilities and illnesses? It almost feels like he is negating his own work. I have friends who share similar doubts. One of them expressed a strong reaction, saying, “What nerve does that screenwriter have to say that?” Indeed, given that his past works have dealt with illness and disability, his statement seems contradictory. While advocating for free expression, it’s important for influential people to consider how their words will be perceived.
Insights Through Experience
During my time working part-time at a law firm, I had the opportunity to hear various stories from clients. One day, a client suffering from a severe illness spoke about social issues based on her experiences. I was deeply moved by her story. Her determination to live positively despite her illness inspired me. She expressed her desire to share her experiences to encourage others in similar situations. I believe that her approach gives illness a value that transcends mere commercial use as a “tool for emotion.”
Freedom of Expression and Its Responsibility
Freedom of expression is a vital right for us. However, this freedom comes with responsibilities. Especially when influential individuals speak, they need to be aware of how their words resonate. For instance, a former announcer like her sharing her experiences certainly raises important social issues. However, it’s also understandable to be sensitive to the potential for those messages to be used as “tools for emotion.” How we face this issue will likely influence the future of our society. What do you think? I would love to hear your experiences and thoughts on such themes in the comments. I’m looking forward to hearing your opinions.
