Understanding the Controversy Surrounding the Third-Party Committee's Report on Masahiro Nakai

Understanding the Controversy Surrounding the Third-Party Committee’s Report on Masahiro Nakai

Reflecting on the Third-Party Committee’s Issues

Recently, I came across Tohru Hashimoto’s criticism of the third-party committee’s report regarding Masahiro Nakai, where he urged against “condemnation.” While I see some merit in his opinion, I can’t help but feel that his reasoning lacks coherence. First of all, I believe his point about “it’s dangerous for a man to be labeled

Tohru Hashimoto's Controversial Defense of Masahiro Nakai: Analyzing Legal Perspectives and Corporate Investigations

Tohru Hashimoto’s Controversial Defense of Masahiro Nakai: Analyzing Legal Perspectives and Corporate Investigations

Thoughts on Tohru Hashimoto’s Statements

Recently, I was honestly surprised to see Tohru Hashimoto making statements in defense of Masahiro Nakai. When I heard him say things like, “It’s dangerous for a man to be labeled a criminal based solely on a woman’s claims,” and “A crime of non-consensual intercourse does not simply arise from a lack of consent,” I

Tohru Hashimoto's Criticism of the Masahiro Nakai Report: Analyzing Media Influence and Accountability

Tohru Hashimoto’s Criticism of the Masahiro Nakai Report: Analyzing Media Influence and Accountability

Question from a reader:
I was a bit puzzled after seeing Tohru Hashimoto criticize the committee regarding the third-party report on Masahiro Nakai from Fuji TV. He mentioned things like “Don’t condemn” and “He had no chance for defense,” but I feel that his criticism might be off the mark. The report is an internal investigation using WHO standards, not

Analyzing Tohru Hashimoto's Criticism of the Third-Party Committee: Accountability in Media and Internal Investigations

Analyzing Tohru Hashimoto’s Criticism of the Third-Party Committee: Accountability in Media and Internal Investigations

Question from a reader:
After seeing Tohru Hashimoto criticize the committee, I became a bit curious. Regarding the report from the third-party committee about Masahiro Nakai from Fuji TV, he mentioned things like “don’t condemn” and “there was no opportunity for defense,” but is it truly the committee’s fault? That report is based on an internal investigation according to WHO standards,

Nakai Masahiro's Silence: The Importance of Clear Communication in Controversial Situations

Nakai Masahiro’s Silence: The Importance of Clear Communication in Controversial Situations

Question from the readers:
If Masahiro Nakai wants to claim “it’s not sexual violence,” shouldn’t he say everything? It feels like Tohru Hashimoto’s advice is missing the point. Recently, I heard that Nakai seems to want to say that “the report from the third-party committee is one-sided” and sought advice from Hashimoto. Hashimoto mentioned, “If you hear Nakai’s story, some people