Reader’s Question:
Is it possible that Masahiro Nakai is not aware of the contradictions in his words and actions? I heard recently that he argued again with the third-party committee, insisting that they disclose his hearing audio. However, it seems that the reason for not being able to carry out the hearing with the woman was his refusal to lift the
Question from a reader:
I’m a bit curious about the incident where Masahiro Nakai tried to give 1 million yen in cash to a woman who was hospitalized. According to reports from Fuji TV, he instructed that cash be delivered to a female announcer who had been hospitalized due to allegations of sexual violence. It seems that this was an offer
Recently, Toru Hashimoto’s statement “If you can’t provide evidence, don’t judge” has been a topic of discussion. From a legal standpoint, it’s true that without evidence, a trial cannot proceed. However, I believe we need to delve deeper into the issue surrounding Masahiro Nakai’s refusal to waive his confidentiality obligation. As someone
Question from readers:
Regarding Masahiro Nakai, do you all really consider it a “romantic trouble”? When considering the age difference, positions, and power dynamics within the industry, can we truly assert that there was “consent”? By underestimating the definition of “sexual violence,” are we inadvertently ignoring the voices of the victims? Also, are you influenced by Nakai’s comments about his “innocence”?
Question from a reader:
What was the emotional state of the woman who was invited by Masahiro Nakai? Humans and animals have various emotions, and I’m curious about what she felt at that moment.
Recently, I heard stories related to Masahiro Nakai’s invitation, which made me think a lot. Imagining the feelings of the victimized woman, it’s
Question from a reader:
I believe that the upper management of Fuji TV saying it’s a “private issue between men and women” is merely an excuse to protect Masahiro Nakai. When reading the report from the third-party committee, it’s clear that the statements from the president and others claiming “this is a private matter” seem to be aimed at shielding
Question from Readers:
Do you think it is reasonable for Masahiro Nakai’s side to impose a new confidentiality obligation on the female announcer? The third-party committee of Fuji Television has published a response document to Nakai’s side. Within this document, it has been noted that Nakai’s lawyer proposed a new confidentiality obligation stating that the victim must not disclose any information
Question from a reader:
I think the statement from the upper management of Fuji TV that it’s a “private matter between men and women” is just an excuse to protect Masahiro Nakai. When reading the report from the third-party committee, the presidents are saying, “This is a personal issue,” but since he is the face of the program and an important
Question from Readers:
Do you think it’s reasonable for Masahiro Nakai’s team to impose a new confidentiality obligation on the female announcer? According to a document released by the third-party committee of Fuji Television, Nakai’s lawyer proposed to the victimized woman that she must not disclose anything discussed in the committee to external parties. Despite the woman’s intent to completely nullify
Recently, I’ve been reflecting on Masahiro Nakai’s rebuttal against the third-party committee at Fuji TV. The third-party committee is a voluntary organization established by companies to investigate internal issues with external experts, and it does not have legal authority. Therefore, it is true that there is no obligation to disclose
