Question from a reader:
I was a bit puzzled after seeing Tohru Hashimoto criticize the committee regarding the third-party report on Masahiro Nakai from Fuji TV. He mentioned things like “Don’t condemn” and “He had no chance for defense,” but I feel that his criticism might be off the mark. The report is an internal investigation using WHO standards, not
Reader’s Question:
Regarding Masahiro Nakai, I think it would be better to stop reopening old wounds. What do you think?
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion surrounding Masahiro Nakai. As the reader’s question suggests, I also share similar feelings about his situation. I wonder if the media should continue to bring it up unless he
Question from a reader:
After seeing Tohru Hashimoto criticize the committee, I became a bit curious. Regarding the report from the third-party committee about Masahiro Nakai from Fuji TV, he mentioned things like “don’t condemn” and “there was no opportunity for defense,” but is it truly the committee’s fault? That report is based on an internal investigation according to WHO standards,
Question from a Reader:
I’ve heard that Masahiro Nakai responded in writing to the third-party committee’s investigation report. Even though he has retired and become a private citizen, can’t he share his thoughts in his own words at a press conference? It seems like that would be a quicker way to address the situation…
Recently,
Question from the readers:
Is it true that Tōru Hashimoto, who defends Masahiro Nakai, claims that the actions do not fall under the definitions of sexual harassment or sexual violence as defined by the WHO?
Recently, Tōru Hashimoto has made headlines with his comments defending Masahiro Nakai. His viewpoint suggests that sexual acts that are not consensual
Question from Readers:
What does it mean when Masahiro Nakai says, “I reap what I sow”? It seems he is angry that his statements are not reflected in the report, and I heard that this is because he did not lift the confidentiality obligation. I wonder if the problem could have been avoided if he had lifted the confidentiality obligation from
Question from a Reader:
Is it possible that Masahiro Nakai is unaware of the contradictions in his own words and actions? I recently heard that he made a rebuttal to the third-party committee, asking them to disclose his hearing audio. However, the reason they couldn’t hear the woman’s side was that he refused to waive confidentiality. Therefore, his testimony was not
Question from a reader:
What do you think about the situation where Masahiro Nakai is said to be “reaping what he has sown”? It seems he is upset that his statements are not reflected in the report, but I heard that due to the failure to lift confidentiality obligations, the female side could not be interviewed, and as a result, his
Recently, Toru Hashimoto’s comments regarding Masahiro Nakai have become a hot topic. While he says, “Do not condemn,” it certainly seems contradictory that he effectively declares Nakai innocent. The fact that he has not listened to the woman’s side of the story is particularly concerning. I also love comedy and often think it would be
Question from a reader:
I’ve heard that Masahiro Nakai’s side is requesting audio data, but wasn’t there any recording made during the hearing?
Recently, I came across news stating that Masahiro Nakai’s side is requesting audio data. It seems like a complex situation. It makes me wonder why there wasn’t any recording made
