Question from a reader:
If someone has no family, how do such incidents come to light? I saw news that a lawyer withdrew 3 million yen from the account of a person under guardianship and did not return the remaining balance after funeral expenses. The lawyer explained that they were “mentally unwell,” but it seems they did not provide any evidence.
Question from a reader:
Can you tell me about lawyer Chuzou Iwata? He seems to be relatively unknown, but it appears he has also been involved in national politics. What are his achievements and characteristics?
Chuzou Iwata is a lawyer who is relatively unknown in the Japanese legal community but has been involved in national politics. Examining
Question from a reader:
Do people from good families really investigate their daughters’ boyfriends through private investigation agencies?
The act of investigating a boyfriend brought home by a daughter from a good family through a private investigation agency has been a topic of discussion from various perspectives in recent years. This issue is not only related to family traditions and
The question posed by readers about which is more shameful between fraud and non-consensual sexual acts touches on a significant theme in the Japanese entertainment industry: societal perceptions and the reactions surrounding serious crimes. Both offenses carry heavy legal ramifications and can profoundly impact an individual’s reputation and privacy. In this blog post, we will explore the legal background,
Understanding the Rise of the Phrase “We Are Not Clarifying the Denial” in Japanese Media Introduction Recently, there has been an observable increase in the phrase “We are not clarifying the denial” in Japanese police statements related to criminal investigations. This specific wording is not merely a bureaucratic formality but carries significant implications regarding legal, psychological, and ethical dimensions. In
Toru Hashimoto, the lawyer, has stated, “Based on the facts I understand, Nakai’s actions do not constitute ‘sexual violence’,” but what exactly does he mean by “facts”? He also mentioned in the same post that he has “not heard anything from Nakai or his representative lawyer.” How can he claim to have “grasped the facts” without
Recently, Toru Hashimoto’s statement “If you can’t provide evidence, don’t judge” has been a topic of discussion. From a legal standpoint, it’s true that without evidence, a trial cannot proceed. However, I believe we need to delve deeper into the issue surrounding Masahiro Nakai’s refusal to waive his confidentiality obligation. As someone
Question from a reader:
Tōru Hashimoto has stated, “Do not judge Nakai if you cannot provide evidence,” but I believe this issue is not a trial to begin with. The third-party committee is conducting an internal investigation to see how the company has responded, and it is not meant to legally punish anyone. Isn’t it unreasonable to confuse this and
Question from Readers:
What do you think about Masahiro Nakai’s lawyer requesting the third-party committee to “disclose evidence supporting the allegations of sexual violence”? It seems the deadline is set for May 26, but isn’t it fundamentally information that shouldn’t be disclosed in the first place? Since all members of the third-party committee are lawyers, they are bound by confidentiality obligations
Recently, discussions surrounding sexual violence have intensified. Particularly regarding the case of Nakai Masahiro, various opinions have emerged, but I believe we should approach this matter with more calmness. From a legal perspective, I have also taken some time to reflect on this issue. Firstly, it is crucial and justifiable for women who have
