Toru Hashimoto, the lawyer, has stated, “Based on the facts I understand, Nakai’s actions do not constitute ‘sexual violence’,” but what exactly does he mean by “facts”? He also mentioned in the same post that he has “not heard anything from Nakai or his representative lawyer.” How can he claim to have “grasped the facts” without
Recently, Toru Hashimoto’s statement “If you can’t provide evidence, don’t judge” has been a topic of discussion. From a legal standpoint, it’s true that without evidence, a trial cannot proceed. However, I believe we need to delve deeper into the issue surrounding Masahiro Nakai’s refusal to waive his confidentiality obligation. As someone
Question from a reader:
Tōru Hashimoto has stated, “Do not judge Nakai if you cannot provide evidence,” but I believe this issue is not a trial to begin with. The third-party committee is conducting an internal investigation to see how the company has responded, and it is not meant to legally punish anyone. Isn’t it unreasonable to confuse this and
Question from Readers:
What do you think about Masahiro Nakai’s lawyer requesting the third-party committee to “disclose evidence supporting the allegations of sexual violence”? It seems the deadline is set for May 26, but isn’t it fundamentally information that shouldn’t be disclosed in the first place? Since all members of the third-party committee are lawyers, they are bound by confidentiality obligations
Recently, discussions surrounding sexual violence have intensified. Particularly regarding the case of Nakai Masahiro, various opinions have emerged, but I believe we should approach this matter with more calmness. From a legal perspective, I have also taken some time to reflect on this issue. Firstly, it is crucial and justifiable for women who have
Reader’s Question:
What did Watanabe Nagi experience with Nakai Masa? I’m curious about it.
Recently, the topic of Watanabe Nagi and Nakai Masa has been generating a lot of discussion. Particularly, testimonies from the female side have attracted attention, but this is a very complex issue. The question of consent is a
Question from a Reader:
Is it possible that Nakai-kun’s inability to lift his confidentiality obligation is due to the nature of his sexual conduct as an announcer being quite serious, and if it were to come to light, it could lead to severe consequences?
Recently, various discussions have emerged regarding Nakai-kun. Speculations about why he
Question from a reader:
Is Mizuhara Ippei’s lawyer competent? It seems like he is gaining a worse impression by not apologizing in front of the camera. He mentioned something about a plea deal, but is it true that he committed the crime because the treatment wasn’t good? I think it would have been better if he had shown a more sincere
Question from a reader:
Can we really trust the results of the independent committee’s investigation at Fuji TV? Is there any point in discussing matters related to Masahiro Nakai? The independent committee is established by external experts to investigate corporate misconduct, but I feel that the results are not necessarily reliable. In the past, reports from committees set up by companies have been denied in court, and there may be interpretations that favor the company. While the members of Fuji TV’s committee are lawyers, I wonder if they are truly independent.
