Reader’s Question:
As the shareholders’ meeting of Fuji Media Holdings approaches, I am feeling quite anxious about the management of Fuji TV. I’ve heard that the issues surrounding Masahiro Nakai have led to a decline in the company’s health and a significant drop in CM sponsors. The news of Fuji’s first-ever deficit is shocking. While Fuji claims to be advancing reforms,
Question from a reader:
Despite reaching a settlement, there have been reports of sexual violence involving someone resembling Watanabe Nagisa, leading to Nakai-kun’s retirement and a loss of sponsors for Fuji TV. Even though subcontractors are also suffering secondary damage, why is it that Nakai-kun can only respond, while that person’s lawyer claims “secondary harm”?
Reader’s Question:
I often come across online news about Watanabe Nagisa, always with titles like “Resigned from Fuji TV” or “Announced PTSD.” It gets a bit tiresome to hear the same things repeatedly. Why is it that these topics are written about so often?
Lately, I’ve noticed that every time I see news regarding
Question from a Reader:
What is the purpose of Fuji TV’s third-party committee?
Recently, Fuji TV’s establishment of a third-party committee has become a topic of discussion. Honestly, this was somewhat surprising, considering that the former president had stated that “third-party committees are not trustworthy.” I decided to think a little about what this means.
Reader’s Question:
Every time I come across news about Watanabe Nagisa, I wonder why there are always reports that say things like “she left Fuji TV” or “she disclosed her PTSD.” Honestly, it’s starting to get a bit tiresome. Why does this information keep repeating?
When talking with friends, I often find news about Watanabe Nagisa coming
Question from Readers:
I’ve come across online news about Watanabe Nagisa, but why is it always mentioned in the titles and articles that she “left Fuji TV” or “disclosed her PTSD”? Honestly, I find it a bit bothersome.
Recently, I’ve been seeing a lot of online news concerning Watanabe Nagisa. Indeed, it’s noticeable that titles
Question from readers:
What do you think about Nakai-san’s counterattack?
Recently, there has been much discussion surrounding Nakai-san. Various opinions are circulating, and as someone who studies law, I would like to share my thoughts. Firstly, it’s intriguing to note the comments suggesting that Nakai-san’s lawyer may be leveraging the situation. Lawyers naturally aim to maximize the benefits
Question from a reader:
I believe that the upper management of Fuji TV saying it’s a “private issue between men and women” is merely an excuse to protect Masahiro Nakai. When reading the report from the third-party committee, it’s clear that the statements from the president and others claiming “this is a private matter” seem to be aimed at shielding
Question from a reader:
I think the statement from the upper management of Fuji TV that it’s a “private matter between men and women” is just an excuse to protect Masahiro Nakai. When reading the report from the third-party committee, the presidents are saying, “This is a personal issue,” but since he is the face of the program and an important
Recently, I’ve been reflecting on Masahiro Nakai’s rebuttal against the third-party committee at Fuji TV. The third-party committee is a voluntary organization established by companies to investigate internal issues with external experts, and it does not have legal authority. Therefore, it is true that there is no obligation to disclose
