Question from a Reader:
It seems that Masahiro Nakai has claimed he was ambushed by a third-party committee, but what do you think about the fact that he lied about inviting other people and called a woman to his room? I would like you to point that out as well.
Recently, there has
Question from a reader:
What are your thoughts on why Nakai Masahiro is angry about his statements not being reflected in the report? According to lawyer Nishiwaki’s explanation, it seems that because he did not lift his confidentiality obligation, the hearing on the female side could not take place, and as a result, his testimony could not be included in the
Question from Readers:
What does it mean when Masahiro Nakai says, “I reap what I sow”? It seems he is angry that his statements are not reflected in the report, and I heard that this is because he did not lift the confidentiality obligation. I wonder if the problem could have been avoided if he had lifted the confidentiality obligation from
Question from a Reader:
Is it possible that Masahiro Nakai is unaware of the contradictions in his own words and actions? I recently heard that he made a rebuttal to the third-party committee, asking them to disclose his hearing audio. However, the reason they couldn’t hear the woman’s side was that he refused to waive confidentiality. Therefore, his testimony was not
Question from a reader:
What do you think about the situation where Masahiro Nakai is said to be “reaping what he has sown”? It seems he is upset that his statements are not reflected in the report, but I heard that due to the failure to lift confidentiality obligations, the female side could not be interviewed, and as a result, his
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion surrounding Nakai Masahiro’s attempt to impose new confidentiality obligations on a female announcer. Honestly, I feel a mix of surprise and confusion regarding this issue. In this post, I’d like to share my thoughts on whether this proposal is reasonable from a legal perspective.
Recently, Toru Hashimoto’s statement “If you can’t provide evidence, don’t judge” has been a topic of discussion. From a legal standpoint, it’s true that without evidence, a trial cannot proceed. However, I believe we need to delve deeper into the issue surrounding Masahiro Nakai’s refusal to waive his confidentiality obligation. As someone
Question from Readers:
Do you think it is reasonable for Masahiro Nakai’s side to impose a new confidentiality obligation on the female announcer? The third-party committee of Fuji Television has published a response document to Nakai’s side. Within this document, it has been noted that Nakai’s lawyer proposed a new confidentiality obligation stating that the victim must not disclose any information
Question from a reader:
Tōru Hashimoto has stated, “Do not judge Nakai if you cannot provide evidence,” but I believe this issue is not a trial to begin with. The third-party committee is conducting an internal investigation to see how the company has responded, and it is not meant to legally punish anyone. Isn’t it unreasonable to confuse this and
Question from Readers:
Do you think it’s reasonable for Masahiro Nakai’s team to impose a new confidentiality obligation on the female announcer? According to a document released by the third-party committee of Fuji Television, Nakai’s lawyer proposed to the victimized woman that she must not disclose anything discussed in the committee to external parties. Despite the woman’s intent to completely nullify
