Questions from Readers
I have some concerns regarding the reports about Ryoko Hirosue. While it’s understandable that incidents involving celebrities attract media attention, I feel it crosses a line when reporters go as far as to approach her father in her hometown of Kochi and ask, “Have you had any contact?” Even though her father stated, “I have nothing to
say,” broadcasting that footage along with his expressions and reactions feels more like “exposure” rather than legitimate reporting. Some may argue that conveying the sentiments of those around her and her family is a matter of press freedom, but I question whether it’s appropriate to pursue relatives who are not directly involved to this extent. Moreover, I feel that touching upon the absence of her mother after the scandal, or repeatedly reporting on her father’s expressions outside their home, is an invasion of privacy. Reporting sensationally about “confusion” and “strange behavior” despite the absence of drug test results, followed by a home search, can lead people to assume the worst. I am concerned that this flow of reporting is neglecting human rights and rational judgment. Finding a balance between press freedom and individual dignity and human rights is crucial. How do you all feel about the way journalists are handling this situation and the nature of such reporting?
Press Freedom and Individual Dignity
Recently, watching reports about Ryoko Hirosue has prompted some reflection. With her private life becoming a topic of interest, I honestly think it is excessive for reporters to travel to her hometown of Kochi to interview her family. Even when her father says, “I have nothing to say,” showing that moment in the news feels more like “exposure” rather than actual reporting.
Invasion of Privacy
I have also witnessed friends’ families being pursued by the media. They were completely unrelated to the situation, yet the continuous questioning and interviews caused them immense stress. While press freedom is important, I wonder if it is necessary to chase after someone’s private life to such an extent. Particularly, reporting on the absence of her mother or repeatedly showing her father’s expressions outside their home seems to disregard human rights. The sensationalized reporting using terms like “confusion” and “strange behavior,” even when no drug test results are present, seems to hinder rational judgment.
Reflecting on Reporting Practices
Observing these circumstances reaffirms the importance of balancing press freedom with individual dignity. I hope news organizations will adopt greater ethical standards. The increasing number of complaints to the Broadcasting Ethics & Program Improvement Organization (BPO) likely stems from this very issue. While the news we encounter daily is undoubtedly significant, I genuinely wish that the feelings and privacy of those involved are also considered. This realization motivates me to make a conscious effort to better understand others’ feelings in my daily life. So, what do you all think about such reporting? If you have any memories or experiences related to this, please share in the comments. I hope we can all reflect on this issue together.
