Question from a reader:
What are your thoughts on why Nakai Masahiro is angry about his statements not being reflected in the report? According to lawyer Nishiwaki’s explanation, it seems that because he did not lift his confidentiality obligation, the hearing on the female side could not take place, and as a result, his testimony could not be included in the
report. However, to argue later that his statements were ignored feels a bit too convenient. If he had lifted the confidentiality obligation from the start, this issue might not have arisen. In such a situation, do you think it’s credible for someone to change their claims when it becomes disadvantageous for them? How do you all feel about it?
Thoughts on Nakai Masahiro’s Situation
Recently, I came across news about Nakai Masahiro being furious that his statements were not reflected in the report. Honestly, I found this situation a bit puzzling. He claims that because he did not lift his confidentiality obligation, he couldn’t have a hearing, resulting in his voice not being heard. However, to say later that he was “ignored” feels a bit too convenient. I believe that if he had lifted the confidentiality obligation from the beginning, this problem might not have occurred. Those around me seem to share the same opinion, and I wonder if his method of changing claims when they are disadvantageous to him is viewed credibly in society. Especially with such delicate issues, scrutiny is often intense.
Negative Impressions and the Meaning of Investigation
From Nakai’s perspective, he might feel that the third-party committee is merely an outsider, but voicing this could worsen his image. Perhaps he wanted to create an impression of being cooperative with the investigation, but it seems to have made his position even more challenging. Personally, I believe the most important aspect of an investigation is to produce results that both parties can agree upon. Even if a settlement is reached, it would be meaningless if the matter is later brought up again. For that reason, without lifting the confidentiality obligation, future discussions may be difficult.
Personal Feelings and Social Perception
I have friends who are very sensitive about such issues. One of them said, “Even if I say something, the question is whether I’ll be believed,” and I completely agree with him. Especially when the term “sexual violence” is used, the weight of that phrase is immeasurable. While Nakai asserts that he has not engaged in any violent acts, hearing that the report claims there was planned coercion complicates the situation. It makes me feel that there are different forms of communication and ways of conveying information that carry a sense of tension, unlike our usual interactions.
What are your thoughts?
I think there are various opinions on such topics. I often worry that by saying something, I might hurt someone. That’s why I’d love to hear about your experiences and opinions. I would be happy to discuss this in the comments!
