Question from a reader:
I’ve heard that Furuichi Noriyoshi sent an eight-page questionnaire to the lawyer representing the victim regarding the reports about Nakai Masahiro’s sexual violence designation. He is an outsider who is neither Nakai’s representative nor affiliated with him, correct? If he wanted to verify the weekly magazine’s article, he should have contacted Bunshun. Why did he send a
direct request to the lawyer on the women’s side? What authority or position does he have to take this action? Is this behavior acceptable?
Considering Furuichi Noriyoshi’s Actions
Recently, I came across the news that Furuichi Noriyoshi sent an eight-page questionnaire to the lawyer representing the victim regarding the sexual violence designation of Nakai Masahiro. He is an outsider, not affiliated with Nakai in any way. It’s worth pondering what his intentions behind this action might have been.
Intent for Information Gathering
First of all, Furuichi holds a position as a journalist. His decision to send the questionnaire may stem from a desire to pursue the truth. By obtaining information from his perspective, he likely aimed for a deeper understanding. There might also have been curiosity about the events behind the reports. Of course, whether external intervention is appropriate is a separate issue.
Authority and Position
Now, regarding the authority or position he had in taking this action, he does not possess any legal authority. He sent the questionnaire as an ordinary citizen. Whether this is permissible is open to debate. Generally, it might feel a bit excessive for a third party, who is not directly involved, to approach a lawyer directly. It would seem more appropriate to verify with a weekly magazine.
Is This Behavior Acceptable?
I find myself questioning whether this action is acceptable. While seeking information is indeed a freedom, the possibility of imposing pressure on the victim or their representative is problematic. We must also recognize that even casual remarks can hurt others, so we need to act cautiously.
Conclusion
While Furuichi’s actions may stem from a desire to pursue the truth, there are legal and ethical aspects that should also be considered. Although the impact of his actions is uncertain, it emphasizes the importance of treating those around us with compassion. If any readers have had similar experiences or feelings, I encourage you to share in the comments. Even the smallest matters can lead to new perspectives when we discuss them together.
