Questions from Readers
I have questions regarding Fuji TV’s response. I’ve heard that a woman who was affected by Masahiro Nakai’s troubles developed PTSD and was hospitalized. It seems that Fuji TV continued to feature Nakai on their programs without considering her feelings. If this is true, isn’t it natural for the victim to feel like they don’t want to
go to work or want to quit their job? Normally, when a problem arises in a company, it’s standard to investigate the facts first and take action to protect the victim. However, it appears that Fuji TV did nothing until the issue was reported in a weekly magazine and only began to act after it became public knowledge. Doesn’t this indicate a failure to accept corporate responsibility? Labor laws state that if a work-related issue leads to a mental health disorder, the company should be held accountable. Yet, Fuji TV seems to be doing the opposite, putting pressure on the victim instead of protecting her. Furthermore, it seems she had to pay for her own treatment and find a lawyer without any support from the company, forcing her to fight against them. Companies are supposed to have an obligation to protect their employees, yet Fuji TV appears to be ignoring this responsibility. This response seems utterly unreasonable. Recently, the television industry has faced criticism for being too lenient with celebrities and agencies, particularly regarding the Johnny’s issue and the incident involving Hitoshi Matsumoto. It seems that Fuji TV is repeating the same mistakes. Will celebrities continue to be shielded no matter what troubles they cause? If such behavior is tolerated, the credibility of the television industry may plummet. What do you think about this matter? Do you believe Fuji TV’s response is appropriate, or do you think they should take responsibility as a corporation?
Fuji TV’s Response and Corporate Responsibility
There has been a heated discussion recently about Fuji TV’s response. When I heard the news about the woman affected by Masahiro Nakai’s troubles developing PTSD and being hospitalized, it honestly broke my heart. Considering her feelings, I strongly feel that the company should fulfill its responsibilities.
Corporate Priorities
As mentioned in the comments, companies often tend to prioritize “big stars who can boost ratings.” I have felt this myself while working in a judicial scrivener’s office. It’s common in business to prioritize clients and important customers, but it makes one think about the impact this has on human emotions. I recall a story from a friend who worked at a major company and was psychologically pressured due to workplace harassment. Ultimately, he chose to leave to protect his health. I wonder how much the company acted to protect him during that time. Probably not much, as he was not considered a key client.
Concealment and Avoidance of Responsibility
Regarding Fuji TV’s response after the issue became public, it may have felt like a “finally, it’s here” moment for some. As I study law, I can understand the desire of companies to conceal problems. However, it is unacceptable for victims to be driven to despair as a result. I believe companies should have legal responsibilities. In labor law, if work causes a mental health issue, the company is responsible. I have seen several such cases, and it pains me when there is no sign of the company taking action to protect the victims.
Our Experiences and Feelings
Recently, while chatting with a friend at a café, this topic came up. She expressed her frustration regarding the lack of support from her workplace based on her own experiences. Hearing about the experiences of people close to me makes me reflect more deeply. Through my work as a judicial scrivener, I have come to understand the emotional pain of various individuals. Sometimes, during work breaks, I may indulge in too many cookies, relying on sweets for comfort, which can serve as a stress relief. It’s interesting to see how everyone has their own methods of caring for their mental well-being.
We Want to Hear Your Opinion
What do you think about Fuji TV’s response? Do you believe they should take responsibility as a corporation, or do you have a different perspective? Are there people around you who have had similar experiences? Please share your thoughts and experiences in the comments. Even the smallest insights can lead to new perspectives.
