Reflecting on the Sexual Assault Incident at Fuji TV
Recently, the sexual assault incident involving Nakai Masahiro at Fuji TV has become a hot topic. I believe this issue cannot be dismissed as just a scandal; it is a very serious matter. Particularly, according to the report from the third-party committee, the incident was recognized as having occurred “in the
course of business,” which significantly raises questions about the company’s responsibility.
Duty of Care and Corporate Responsibility
Companies have a duty to ensure the safety of their employees. It is natural that they are required to take measures to prevent workplace violence. If they neglect this duty, the company should be held accountable. In this case, the victim has suffered physical and mental impacts, even leading to hospitalization. I feel that this situation warrants recognition as a work-related injury, enabling claims for damages. It truly seems like a situation that should prompt action from the Labor Standards Inspection Office or the courts, yet it is puzzling that nothing has been done.
Secondary Victimization and Organizational Concealment
The subsequent response from Fuji TV is also problematic. Nakai’s program continues to air, and executives introduced him to a lawyer while providing the victim with consolation money, which has been classified as “secondary victimization.” There are testimonies stating that when the victim attempted to return to work, Nakai’s posters were still displayed within the company. This certainly gives the impression that the company is protecting the perpetrator. Such actions would be unacceptable in a typical workplace.
Individual Responsibility vs. Organizational Responsibility
There are also reports that Nakai paid a settlement amount, but that pertains solely to his personal responsibility. It does not absolve Fuji TV of its obligations. I believe that the responsibilities of Nakai and Fuji TV are distinct. As an organization, a more robust response is necessary.
Conclusion and Call to Action
When faced with situations like this, I think it is essential for us as citizens to raise our voices. It is strange that nothing happens just because it is a television network. If the culture of concealment within organizations is not addressed, similar issues will only continue to recur. Many readers may have experienced similar situations. If you have faced workplace troubles or questioned a company’s response, please share your thoughts in the comments. Let’s collectively reflect on this issue.
