Thoughts on Fuji Television’s Reforms
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about the reforms at Fuji Television. The news that a U.S. investment fund has proposed external directors and called for a complete overhaul of the board has raised many eyebrows. Many people are questioning whether this will truly lead to meaningful change.
Doubts About Chairman Kitao’s Statements
Chairman Kitao Yoshitaka’s statements, which once sparked hopes for reform, have raised doubts lately. In a recent press conference, he mentioned that “it’s possible for me to become the chairman of the board,” which created an impression of maintaining the status quo rather than initiating change. Viewers have voiced concerns, stating that it seems like “it’s just a change from Hieda to Kitao.” This leads to the feeling that instead of taking a step toward reform, the company might be moving backward. Moreover, the decision to exclude freelance journalists and only allow major media outlets into press conferences reflects the very culture that Fuji Television has been criticized for. Instead of building trust, this approach risks further alienating viewers.
Surprise at Fukuda Jun’s Inclusion as an External Director Candidate
Another surprising aspect is the inclusion of Fukuda Jun, the president of Start Entertainment, as a candidate for an external director. Bringing in someone from the company that took over talent management from Johnny’s agency raises questions about the appropriateness of this choice as part of governance reform. Given Fukuda’s own scandal, it begs the question: can Fuji Television truly change with such selections?
Lack of Young Perspectives
Additionally, there is a noticeable lack of young perspectives and IT talent, with many former Fuji Television announcers and older individuals in prominent positions. In an era where viewers are increasingly turning away from traditional television, the absence of individuals who can create programs that attract the smartphone generation is alarming. This trend does not bode well for the future of meaningful reform.
Conclusion
Considering the reforms at Fuji Television brings about a mix of hope and concern. To regain viewer trust, serious reform is essential. As we observe future developments, it is important for us as viewers to continue sharing our opinions. What do you think? I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences regarding Fuji Television’s reforms in the comments. It would be great to exchange ideas and information with each other!
