Question from a reader:
Recently, I find the reports about Ryoko Hirosue to be quite abnormal. What do you think? It’s unbelievable that details of the police investigation have leaked, which seems to violate confidentiality obligations. I don’t think it’s fair to circulate information that raises doubts about someone’s character when they have not yet been found guilty. Lawyer Kazuko Ito
has also expressed concerns over the leaks of police information, and I question the media’s reporting stance. Reina Yamazaki has shown worry regarding the reporting of personal information. Just because someone is a celebrity doesn’t mean that everything about them should be publicly reported. Moreover, it’s strange that there has been no correction from the police despite the drug test results being negative. It feels as if the investigation has proceeded under the assumption that they are guilty of drug use, and there seems to be an effort to manipulate public perception. If this continues, Ryoko could be treated as socially guilty. I’m very concerned about the current state of presumption of innocence and the disregard for human rights. I hope someone can provide a clear explanation about this issue.
Reflections on the Reports about Ryoko Hirosue
I certainly feel that there are many aspects of the recent reports about Ryoko Hirosue that seem abnormal. There remain legal questions about the leaks of investigation details. The flow of police information to the media seems to threaten the basic human right of presumption of innocence. Having some exposure to the legal world through my part-time job at a judicial scrivener’s office, I understand the seriousness of this issue. It is really unfair to circulate information that calls into question Ryoko’s character while she has not yet been found guilty.
Media and Police Response
I can understand why Kazuko Ito is concerned about the police’s information leaks. I often find myself thinking, “This seems a bit off,” while watching the news. Observing how the media distorts facts as the investigation progresses feels reminiscent of watching a suspense drama. I’ve increasingly questioned the media’s approach and content in their reporting. I also understand Reina Yamazaki’s concerns regarding the reporting of personal information. It is unreasonable for privacy to be completely disregarded just because someone is a celebrity. They are individuals too, with social responsibilities and rights.
About the Negative Drug Test Results
Furthermore, the lack of correction from the police despite the negative drug test results is strange. It gives the impression that the investigation has been based on the assumption of drug use from the start. This raises suspicions of public perception manipulation. The disregard for the presumption of innocence is a fundamental issue that shakes the very foundations of a rule of law society. As someone studying for the bar exam, I believe that the principle of presumption of innocence is among the most basic tenets of law. If this principle is disregarded in society, no one will be able to enjoy equality under the law.
In Conclusion
Watching this situation unfold, I believe I am not the only one who is worried. I wonder how readers feel about this. If there are recent news items that concern you or legal questions that arise, I would love to hear your thoughts in the comments. I want to think about this together. I believe it is important for all of us to discuss law and human rights.
