Question from the readers:
If Masahiro Nakai’s rebuttal is true, then the third-party committee must be lying, right? In that case, it would imply that they colluded with Fuji TV to make Nakai a scapegoat, and I believe sponsor companies should not be advertising with such a company, don’t you think? Moreover, it seems that it was the former president of
Question from Readers:
What do you think about Masahiro Nakai’s lawyer requesting the third-party committee to “disclose evidence supporting the allegations of sexual violence”? It seems the deadline is set for May 26, but isn’t it fundamentally information that shouldn’t be disclosed in the first place? Since all members of the third-party committee are lawyers, they are bound by confidentiality obligations
Question from a Reader:
Regarding Minister Eto of Agriculture and Forestry, isn’t he supposed to be distributing rice to the public? I have more than enough rice at home, so what’s going on with that?
Recently, while drinking at an izakaya with friends, the topic of Minister Eto came up. Someone asked whether he was
“What do you think about the idea that ‘the one who benefits from lying is the one who is lying’? I’m struggling to understand who is telling the truth regarding Masahiro Nakai and the third-party committee.” Nakai’s side claims that he was interrupted during the hearings and that his statements were not reflected in the report. Additionally,
Question from a reader:
When humans take action actively, I believe there is always a reason behind it. Was Nakai Masahiro’s decision to call the victim to his room based on his feelings for her?
When chatting with friends, we often get caught up discussing celebrity relationships and scandals. Recently, Nakai Masahiro has been a hot
Reader’s Question:
I’ve been wondering whether the recent discussions surrounding Masahiro Nakai are truly accurate. On social media, I often see opinions like “Nakai-san is not at fault” or “there are inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony,” but I’m curious if these opinions are based on a thorough reading of the reports. For instance, some say, “I can’t think of a non-physical
Question from Readers:
Regarding the rebuttal from Masahiro Nakai’s side, despite the hearing lasting six hours, I wonder if it was mostly just casual conversation. Both sides must have recording or video data as evidence, so if they could just confirm whether it exists or not, the conclusion might become clearer. But is that not the case?
Question from the reader:
Why is it that former female announcers from Fuji TV are being bashed online even when they haven’t done anything wrong? Is it just that there are many people looking for stress relief or are they just naturally critical?
Recently, I’ve noticed that former female announcers from
Question from a reader:
I’m curious about what the future holds for Mei Nagano. What kind of activities will she be involved in going forward?
Recently, there has been a lot of discussion regarding Mei Nagano’s upcoming activities. As a fan, I too am keeping a close eye on her developments. There are talks of her
Question from a reader:
There have been recent reports regarding Masahiro Nakai, and I’ve seen opinions on social media suggesting that “this is just a case of a love spat between a man and a woman.” While this post seems plausible at first glance, I am questioning whether that perspective is truly accurate. According to reports, a third-party committee has classified
