Reader’s Question:
With Masahiro Nakai’s side publicly addressing this issue again, is it strange for us to bring up this story? I understand the opinion that it might be kinder to leave it alone since she is trying to move forward. I, too, hope that this incident can be left in the past. However, Nakai’s side has countered the report from
Question from a reader:
Why do so many people try to determine whether there was “consent” solely based on the perpetrator’s account? Regarding the case of Nakai Masahiro, some people say, “Maybe the woman initially consented?” or “Perhaps she just changed her mind later.” However, I believe that these are merely opinions from the perpetrator’s perspective. Ignoring the feelings of the
Recently, the allegations of sexual misconduct against Masahiro Nakai have become a major topic of discussion, and I’ve taken some time to reflect on this matter. The fact that the third-party committee of Fuji TV has recognized that “sexual violence occurred” is quite shocking news. Particularly after reading the report, it becomes clear
Question from a reader:
Why do people believe Masahiro Nakai’s claims? Although Nakai asserts that “this is not sexual violence,” I cannot understand why a third-party committee would provide false reports. If someone in that position were to lie, it would damage the credibility of the lawyers involved and affect their work. Additionally, if there were any issues with the report,
Question from a reader:
I just watched Miyane-ya and would like to confirm the following points. 1. Will the investigation results not be made public? 2. Has Masahiro Nakai been recognized as having committed sexual violence? 3. Is it correct to understand that Nakai’s side will not lift the confidentiality obligation because there are matters they do not want the victim
Reader’s Question:
It feels like the leaders and core members of each team in the Nijisanji box project are almost the same faces. I particularly think there are many popular male Vtubers involved. Is there any reason for this? I enjoy the box project and find it interesting, but I can’t help but notice that the first impressions tend to be
Question from a reader:
It seems that Masahiro Nakai wants to express his opinions, but does that mean he is not listening to the opinions of the victimized women? Does this mean he has no intention of lifting the confidentiality obligation? Is my understanding correct?
Recently, various opinions regarding Masahiro Nakai have been circulating in
Recently, Masahiro Nakai’s sexual misconduct allegations have become a hot topic. It is shocking that the third-party committee of Fuji TV has recognized that “sexual violence occurred.” As mentioned in readers’ opinions, I believe this is not an issue that can be dismissed as a mere misunderstanding.
The suggestion
Question from a reader:
What if the supporters of Masahiro Nakai held a press conference and clearly expressed their opinions? Wouldn’t it be faster to lift the confidentiality obligation of the victim and discuss matters directly?
Recently, I have been reflecting on the news surrounding Masahiro Nakai. Listening to the opinions of his supporters, there’s
Question from a reader:
I just watched Miyane-ya, and I would like to clarify the following points: 1. In the end, does it mean that the investigation results will not be disclosed? 2. Has it been confirmed that Nakai Masahiro committed sexual violence? 3. Is it correct to understand that Nakai Masahiro’s side will not lift the confidentiality obligation because there
