Navigating the Complexities of Confidentiality and Evidence in Social Justice Cases

The Dilemma of Confidentiality and Evidence Disclosure

Recently, I have been feeling quite complicated after observing the interactions between Masahiro Nakai and the third-party committee from Fuji Television. I love comedy and cherish laughter in my daily life, but facing serious issues like this really makes me realize that there are realities we cannot simply laugh off.

The Barrier of

Who Would Win in a Fight: Edogawa Conan vs. Ran-chan – Strength, Strategy, and Sparring Fun

Reader’s Question:
If Edogawa Conan and Ran-chan exchanged kicks and punches, who would flinch first? Which one is stronger?

Who Would Flinch First: Conan or Ran-chan?

So, I’ve been thinking about this fun little debate: if Edogawa Conan and Ran-chan were to exchange kicks and punches, who would flinch first? Honestly, it’s

Nakai Masahiro Case Analysis: Understanding the Controversy and Implications for Fuji Television

Thoughts on Nakai Masahiro’s Case

Recently, there have been various opinions circulating regarding the series of reports about Nakai Masahiro and the conclusions drawn by the third-party committee. I’ve also been contemplating this matter, particularly whether the committee’s designation of “sexual violence” was intended to criticize Fuji Television.

The Essence of the Trouble

First of all, it appears to be

Understanding the Significance of “Silver Bullet” in Detective Conan: A Deep Dive into Symbolism and Meaning

Reader’s Question:
I have a question about Detective Conan. I was just thinking, Belmot refers to Conan as “Silver Bullet.” Isn’t a silver bullet typically associated with defeating wolves? I don’t think it’s meant to represent a bullet that takes down crows, which are linked to the Black Organization’s image. Could

Masahiro Nakai’s Rebuttal: Implications for Victims and Public Perception of Sexual Violence

Question from a Reader:
I have some concerns regarding Masahiro Nakai’s rebuttal document. The third-party committee’s report explicitly states “sexual violence,” yet Nakai asserts that “there was no actual occurrence.” This rebuttal could easily be interpreted as implying that “the women’s claims are false.” Moreover, I’m curious about his expression, “ordinary Japanese people think this way.” Who determined that standard?