Question from a reader:
It seems that even though Kasai Shinsuke has updated his blog, he hasn’t touched on the allegations against Hasegawa Yutaka. Does this mean he has stopped resisting, or does it imply an acknowledgment of the allegations?
Considering the Allegations Against Hasegawa Yutaka
Recently, the absence of any mention of the allegations against Hasegawa Yutaka in Kasai Shinsuke’s blog has become a topic of discussion. In looking at reader comments, there are various intriguing opinions. Some suggest that it could be due to the inability to confront the
allegations, while others mention the difficulty of proving claims. This situation merits consideration from a legal perspective as well.
The Difficulty of Burden of Proof and Counterattacks
Indeed, claims like “I don’t remember” or “I don’t know” are difficult to prove. From a legal standpoint, the burden of proof primarily lies with the party making the assertion. This means that, when making a claim, evidence to support it is necessary. Kasai may be avoiding further commentary because he senses the risks associated with this aspect. During my university studies in law, I realized how crucial evidence is. I recall my professor emphasizing that “without evidence, no matter how correct your statement may be, it is futile.” While expressing one’s opinion is important, lacking supporting evidence makes it feel as if the argument is floating in thin air.
The Significance of Hasegawa’s Public Diary
Additionally, I was surprised by Hasegawa’s decision to publish a “bundle of moldy diaries.” His intention seems to be to assert that he is not lying, but without delving into the contents of those diaries, the truth remains obscured. It feels like a puzzle that needs solving. If the contents were known, one could either affirm or deny the claims, but at this stage, it’s impossible to take a definitive stance. I remember a time when a friend told me, “I have an interesting story,” but I never got to hear the crucial details. The feeling I had then was one of frustration, akin to thinking, “Is that all?” The current situation may evoke similar feelings of uncertainty.
In Conclusion
This series of events prompts reflection on the influence of the media and how personal statements are perceived. The feelings of Kasai and the intentions of Hasegawa are aspects that remain unclear to us. Therefore, it is essential for us to approach this issue with a calm mindset and form our own opinions. If any readers have similar experiences or thoughts, I encourage you to share them in the comments. By sharing our perspectives, we might gain a deeper understanding of the situation.
