Question from readers:
What do you think about Tōru Hashimoto’s comments supporting Masahiro Nakai? Many people may have felt uncomfortable after hearing his statements on “Miyane-ya” on April 1 and “Dotto Connect” on April 5. The report from the third-party committee clearly states that Nakai’s actions occurred in the context of work, placing women in situations where it was difficult for
them to refuse. Despite this, Hashimoto expressed opinions such as “Why didn’t you consult your superior?” and “The term sexual violence is too heavy.” The report points out structural issues within Fuji TV, indicating that sexual violence occurred in the context of work. However, I felt that Hashimoto’s comments seemed to downplay this conclusion. Additionally, when Izumi Maruoka spoke about the current state of the announcement department, her remark that “superiors are also rivals, so it’s impossible to consult” helped to clarify why the victimized women could not seek advice. Do you think Hashimoto’s stance is reasonable? Or do you feel that, based on the third-party committee’s report, his opinions are misaligned? I would like to hear your honest thoughts.
Reflecting on Hashimoto’s Comments
Recently, Tōru Hashimoto’s comments supporting Masahiro Nakai have become a topic of discussion. While opinions on his views are divided, I personally feel a bit of discomfort. Especially when considering the report from the third-party committee, his statements seem somewhat off the mark. First, I want to reflect on Hashimoto’s point about “Why didn’t you consult your superior?” Generally, I agree that consulting a superior would be reasonable. However, in a context where the actions in question are problematic, it’s understandable that someone might find it difficult to consult. Particularly, Izumi Maruoka’s comment about how “superiors are rivals, so it’s impossible to consult” clearly illustrates the reason why the victimized women could not seek advice. Ignoring such circumstances and simply stating that “not consulting was the mistake” seems somewhat unreasonable.
Definition of Sexual Violence and Its Impact
I also want to consider Hashimoto’s statement that “the term sexual violence is too heavy.” There may be some validity to what he says. However, we cannot underestimate the weight that the term sexual violence carries. Depending on the context, sexual violence does not necessarily refer to sexual assault or rape, but the impact of the term cannot be ignored. Especially when considering the suffering and situations of the victims, it is not something that can be taken lightly. In fact, the definition of sexual violence has many facets. According to the WHO’s definition, sexual violence is a broad concept that involves physical and psychological suffering. Therefore, it is undeniable that Hashimoto’s comments could lead to misunderstandings. In reality, many people online confuse sexual offenses with rape.
My Thoughts
As someone studying law, I see some merit in Hashimoto’s opinions, but I also believe we should be cautious when considering the weight of his words. In the legal field, a single word can have a significant impact. Sometimes, premature judgments or statements can complicate matters. I recall a time in university when I jumped to conclusions with my questions, and the surrounding reactions were quite amusing. I remember everyone laughing all at once. Ultimately, I believe we need to discuss sexual violence and harassment more openly. While accepting Hashimoto’s opinions as one perspective, it’s important to prioritize the voices and feelings of the victims. What do you think, readers? I would love to hear your experiences and thoughts on Hashimoto’s opinions in the comments. I’m looking forward to your opinions and feedback.
