Who Would Win in a Fight: Edogawa Conan vs. Ran-chan – Strength, Strategy, and Sparring Fun

Reader’s Question:
If Edogawa Conan and Ran-chan exchanged kicks and punches, who would flinch first? Which one is stronger?

Who Would Flinch First: Conan or Ran-chan?

So, I’ve been thinking about this fun little debate: if Edogawa Conan and Ran-chan were to exchange kicks and punches, who would flinch first? Honestly, it’s

Shinjiro Koizumi’s Agricultural Cooperative Reform: Necessity or Risk for Japan’s Farming Future?

Reader’s Question:
I heard that Shinjiro Koizumi has been appointed as the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. He seems to be pushing for agricultural cooperative reform, but is this really necessary? I worry that it might end up having more disadvantages, similar to his father’s postal reform. What do you think?

Considering the Necessity of Agricultural Cooperative Reform

When I

Nakai Masahiro Case Analysis: Understanding the Controversy and Implications for Fuji Television

Thoughts on Nakai Masahiro’s Case

Recently, there have been various opinions circulating regarding the series of reports about Nakai Masahiro and the conclusions drawn by the third-party committee. I’ve also been contemplating this matter, particularly whether the committee’s designation of “sexual violence” was intended to criticize Fuji Television.

The Essence of the Trouble

First of all, it appears to be

Understanding the Significance of “Silver Bullet” in Detective Conan: A Deep Dive into Symbolism and Meaning

Reader’s Question:
I have a question about Detective Conan. I was just thinking, Belmot refers to Conan as “Silver Bullet.” Isn’t a silver bullet typically associated with defeating wolves? I don’t think it’s meant to represent a bullet that takes down crows, which are linked to the Black Organization’s image. Could

Masahiro Nakai’s Rebuttal: Implications for Victims and Public Perception of Sexual Violence

Question from a Reader:
I have some concerns regarding Masahiro Nakai’s rebuttal document. The third-party committee’s report explicitly states “sexual violence,” yet Nakai asserts that “there was no actual occurrence.” This rebuttal could easily be interpreted as implying that “the women’s claims are false.” Moreover, I’m curious about his expression, “ordinary Japanese people think this way.” Who determined that standard?